Gofer Services Limited (2103 bytes)

Gofer Services Limited -

 

making the most of technology in your business

 

Who we are
What we do
Why us?
Our Guarantee
Our Opinions
Contacts

Planning Philosophy
IS Strategy

Information Systems Strategy

Why do we need one (and, if so, how)?

Strategic planning has almost become an unfashionable term in today’s volatile operating environment. Today, we all tend to adopt the “ready, fire, aim” philosophy. That is fine, when a bullet is cheap: not so good when the reactive firing costs many millions by committing you to the wrong technology path.

So, knowing where you are going as an organisation is still important. It is just as important with information systems where not only are your needs changing, but the whole information technology environment is itself changing even more rapidly. As the world gets smaller and faster, the companies that can use information best will win.  A strategy for this is essential.

We are therefore often asked whether it is really possible to have an information system strategy that can be developed rapidly and cost effectively, focused on what practically needs to be done?

A Pragmatic Approach

We have found that such practical information systems strategic plans need to address the following areas:

  •  the organisation’s purpose and direction, particularly as it impacts on information technology needs

  • technology trends and issues potentially impacting on the organisation

  • current information technology situation analysis

  •  policy issues relating to the use of information technology, including the management of information technology

  •  implications in the previous material for current and proposed applications

  •  recommended technology architectures (with reasons and implications of alternatives where options exist)

  •  implementation priorities and approach

  •  cost / benefit material to the extent appropriate within the scope of the work - at a high level at the planning stage

This needs to be undertaken in an iterative way aimed at providing a “high level” early cut, followed by refinement through more detailed investigation only where it is of demonstrable benefit. For that reason we normally recommend the work be divided into four phases so you can checkpoint progress and results after each phase:

Phase 1:    Review of Existing Material and Situation – a scoping review

Phase 2:    Investigation of Key Needs and Issues

Phase 3:    Development of Strategic Outline

Phase 4:    Establish Scope of Implementation Projects and Complete Plan

We find the phases to some extent run concurrently, but at the conclusion of each phase there is an opportunity to review progress and redefine the scope of the balance of the work if appropriate.

So what needs to be done?

Phase 1:           Review Existing Material and Situation

In this phase you should review past information systems strategic planning material, information on the current systems infrastructure and supporting business processes environment, and material on the current organisational focus and direction. You should identify critical issues for review at the conclusion of this phase to ensure subsequent phases are focused on the most important areas for the organisation.

Phase 2:           Investigation of Key Needs and Issues

This phase should investigate and document key information systems infrastructure needs at both the operational and executive management level.  These are compared to the current delivered functionality of the existing application systems.  Although primarily aimed at gathering the information required to develop the IS Strategy you should also seek to identify any issues that could be resolved by short term actions outside of the strategy.

At the conclusion of this phase the principal focus and scope of the strategy, including particular policy, architecture or application directions which will underpin the strategy, should be determined.

In most organisations today, we find the information systems strategy is driven by the application architecture ie top down from the business (because of the comprehensive functionality in many core products). It is still necessary, however, to integrate that with the technology architecture view – ie bottom up from the technology. Even the almost boring bits of “how do we deliver all this additional information over the network” is still critical!

Phase 3:           Develop Strategy

During this phase you develop an initial draft of the strategy encompassing the following at a level appropriate for the agreed scope.

  • the organisation purpose and direction, particularly as it impacts on information technology needs

  •  technology trends and issues potentially impacting the organisation

  •  current information technology situation analysis

  •  policy issues, including the management issues, relating to the use of information technology

  •  implications in the previous material for current and proposed applications

  •  recommended technology architectures (with reasons and implications of alternatives where options exist)

This needs management and, potentially governing body, approval before moving to the final phase.

Phase 4:          Establish Scope of Implementation Projects and Complete Plan

From the analysis carried out in the previous three phases and the business needs and priorities you then identify implementation projects to apply the strategy to meet the requirements. It is necessary to scope the projects to the level appropriate for inclusion in the final version of the plan.

Then, (shock, horror!) all you need to do is select the right products, implement them, manage the organisation changes, manage the scope creep, and still bring it in within budget. But, we didn’t say it was easy, just that it has to be done – or you will be firing expensive bullets in the dark!

(A version of this article was prepared by Brent Sutherland for The Simpl Group and published in Local Government Magazine)

 
Planning Philosophy ] [ IS Strategy ]
Copyright © 1997 -2008 Gofer Services Ltd - Last modified: October 04, 2008